Rudi Matthee: Civil Society and the Public Sphere in Early Modern Iran

Abstract
Civil Society and the Public Sphere in Early Modern Iran
An old Orientalist trope going back to early modern Western observers holds that a despotic state assisted by a suffocating faith, Islam, crowded out manifestations of public life in Islamic societies by stifling popular self-articulation, preventing the emergence of civic pride, and disallowing civil disobedience beyond bread riots. This presentation takes issue with this portrayal of a populace cowering in fear in the face of overpowering authority and extends existing revisionist scholarship on the issue to Safavid and Qajar Iran, with the argument that Iran has a strong tradition of civic mindedness. This comes out in 1.) the remarkably accessible Safavid shah, 2.) the urban maydan as an agora-like public space, 3.) a culture that fostered intellectual debate and even countenanced freedom of conscience, 4.) the centrality of justice and its pursuit in Iranian mythology, 5.) epic poetry and manuals of manners and morals, and 6.) the civic pride and communal historical consciousness that helped the elites of the scattered oases on the Iranian plateau preserve local self-rule and social purpose. Early modern Iran, therefore, knew an implicit “social contract,” between subjects, who, though not citizens in the modern sense of the word, claimed rights, including the right to dissent. Their government, which, though often despotic, was bound by limits that, of needs, it had to observe.
