Frantz Grenet: Kušān Rulers: In Search of an Imperial Narrative
This lecture is part 2 of 4 of the 2026 Biennial Ehsan Yarshater Lecture Series, delivered by Frantz Grenet on the theme, “Ancient Iran and Central Asia: Interactions and Shifting Identities.”
Abstract
Kušān Rulers: In Search of an Imperial Narrative (Second to Fourth Centuries CE)
Evidence such as coinage, the Rabatak inscription, the archaeological site of Surkh Kotal, and Huviška’s cotton painting sheds light on the political discourse of the Kušāns. Kaniška’s (r. 126–c. 150) ideological program focused on the following:
(1) abandoning the Greek script in diplomatic discourse, favoring an “Aryan” (that is, the Bactrian) language; and utilizing Indian titles (e.g., devaputra “son of god”) on the eastern side of the empire;
(2) incorporating Achaemenid formulaic language into the self-presentation of the sources of his power; and
(3) emphasizing a multicultural message rooted in religious plurality.
The latter point is evidenced by the observance of a specific iteration of Zoroastrianism, the patronage of multiple Indian cults (including Buddhism, though primarily at a local Indian level), and support for a more elaborate form of syncretism through the promotion of two specific religious figures: Wēš, a version of the god Vayu addressing the Shivaites, and Manāvagh, a version of Vohu Manah addressing the Vishnuites.
These tendencies were further developed under the successor dynasty of the Kušāno-Sasanians (c. 280–400 CE). Such actions served to consolidate Kušān rule, foster a shared cultural identity across the vast empire, and facilitate the spread of ideas along the Silk Road.